<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Flesh” is not “Human effort” in Gal 3:3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jasonstaples.com/blog/2010/flesh-is-not-human-effort-in-gal-33-595/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jasonstaples.com/blog/2010/flesh-is-not-human-effort-in-gal-33-595</link>
	<description>Ruminations on biblical studies, technology, economics, and sports from Jason A. Staples</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 17:40:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan King</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonstaples.com/blog/2010/flesh-is-not-human-effort-in-gal-33-595#comment-152</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan King</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 18:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonstaples.com/blog/?p=595#comment-152</guid>
		<description>I can really appreciate what you are saying about using &#039;human effort&#039; instead of &#039;flesh&#039; as diminishing a really strong and valid point.  While this discussion really interests me, I would say that the grace vs. works argument is so very important and Paul definitely supports the grace argument as I&#039;ve discerned from Romans and especially in the entirety of Galatians.  

I think that the theme of grace is so very important for our churches to emphasize.  I appreciate theological discernment but at the heart of things I sometimes think that the simple, yet appropriate, rendering of the message held in scripture is best for new Christians especially.  

I&#039;ve been writing about religious legalism on my blog and would love to know some of your thoughts about what I&#039;ve written.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can really appreciate what you are saying about using &#8216;human effort&#8217; instead of &#8216;flesh&#8217; as diminishing a really strong and valid point.  While this discussion really interests me, I would say that the grace vs. works argument is so very important and Paul definitely supports the grace argument as I&#8217;ve discerned from Romans and especially in the entirety of Galatians.  </p>
<p>I think that the theme of grace is so very important for our churches to emphasize.  I appreciate theological discernment but at the heart of things I sometimes think that the simple, yet appropriate, rendering of the message held in scripture is best for new Christians especially.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been writing about religious legalism on my blog and would love to know some of your thoughts about what I&#8217;ve written.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen C. Carlson</title>
		<link>http://www.jasonstaples.com/blog/2010/flesh-is-not-human-effort-in-gal-33-595#comment-151</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen C. Carlson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Feb 2010 13:49:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jasonstaples.com/blog/?p=595#comment-151</guid>
		<description>Good point.  I hadn&#039;t really considered the extent of the theological problems with the rendering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point.  I hadn&#8217;t really considered the extent of the theological problems with the rendering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

